Monday, October 7, 2013

Ben Hur



Good Rendition
This TV mini-series version of Ben Hur was a good rendition based on the novel by Lew Wallace. It stars The Vampire Diaries' Joseph Morgan as the title character Judah Ben Hur. His performance was more acceptable than the more well known Hollywood epic version with Charlton Heston in that role. What it lacked in big budget and overall production value it made up for in character development because since it was in a mini-series format it had more time to bring in a bit more detail than any of the previous big screen versions and was better able to fill in some of the blanks left missing, particularly in the Heston film. Overall it was a valiant effort to bring the story afresh and consider it worth a viewing.

Sex and violence without style
I have seen both versions of Ben Hur, its earlier black and white version and the 1959 version starring Charlton Heston and Stephen Boyd, so the comparison between the 1955 version and this one is still fresh in my mind. I had recently watched the DeMille version before watching this miniseries and the differences are monumental.

I doubt that director, Stephen Shill, set out to make an epic adventure and in that he succeeded. Shill's Ben Hur is a little movie with the emphasis on sex and as much nudity as he could get on the screen to spice up what needs no spice, rather like adding a cup full of jalapenos to an already spicy chili.

Shill's Ben Hur is earthy with a very young cast, most of whom give credible performances, but in whom there is little of gravitas or depth. Joseph Morgan broods well and purses his full lips as often as possible but fails to give more than brooding life to the character of Judah ben Hur. Kristin Kreuk is wasted as Tirzah and Alex...

Modern Story of Early 1st Century C.E. Jerusalem
Unlike the Heston epic, Christ makes just three cameo appearances. However, this is not a story of religious faith. When present, religion is subordinated in the plot by the movie director to create an intriguing modern tale. This is not a for children-recommended epic, but it is a mature, detailed-filled, contemporary interpretation of the Lew Wallace classic.

At times taking great historical license, this is the story of the Hur family: Their suffering, survival, and triumph over Roman political oppression in 1st Century C.E. Jerusalem. Deeper, this is also a tale of two individuals: one Jewish (Judah) and one Roman (Messala) and their interpersonal bonding as children and their adult psycho-political conflicts. Ultimately, this is an story of power: The Conquerors (Rome personified in the Agrippas, Arias, Pilate, and Tiberias) and The Conquered (namely, the Hur Family, Greeks, Jews, slaves, and other residents of 1 Century C.E. Jerusalem). .

As adult-level...

Click to Editorial Reviews

No comments:

Post a Comment